Decrypt crc32 password

NTLM passwords are considered weak because they can be brute-forced very easily with modern hardware. NTLM Decrypt. SHA Decrypt. View jobs Upload new list Manage your lists.

Enter your hashes here and we will attempt to decrypt them for free online. Hashes max. Show plains and salts in hex format. Show algorithm of founds. What is this tool. It's like having your own massive hash-cracking cluster - but with immediate results! We have been building our hash database since August A hash function is a function, mathematical or otherwise, that takes a variable length input string and called a pre-image and converts it to a fixed length generally smaller output string called a hash value.

A hash function like CRC32 calculates a simple value given variable input. The calculation is not reversible - i.

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow.

Learn more. Asked 11 years, 9 months ago. Active 1 month ago. Viewed 10k times. I am retrieving lists of crc32 hashes that contain names of files, not there contents. Improve this question. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. It can't be decrypted. Improve this answer. Andrey Andrey Didn't downvote you, but notice: CRC is not a one-way hash function, it is just an insecure hash function.

No, it isn't Google shall reveal this fact quite fast. For example, see criterions for cryptographic hash functions at Wiki: en. Don't confuse Cryptographic hash function and hash function. I figured that, thanks much. There is no inverse function.

Ok, you know y and salt. Is it better? No, because you still can find inverse of crc. Show 1 more comment. EDIT: definitions by Bruce Schneier author of Applied Cryptography, among other things : One-way functions are relatively easy to compute, but significantly harder to reverse.

The security of a one-way hash function is its one-wayness. Hanin M. Hanin 7, 31 31 silver badges 51 51 bronze badges. With this description, all hash algorithms are "lacking the one-way part", as you can always run brute-force on data to find which one s are producing the desired outcome. I didn't define the "one-way" part. If you consider brute-force, then everything is insecure except for One Time Pads and derived algorithms like some secret-sharing schemes.